U.S. Constitution
Preamble
U.S. Constitution – Preamble
We The People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Previous:U.S. Constitution (Full) |
Next:Article I |
Counsel Notes
The Preamble to the Constitution is one sentence with a basic simple structure. It has a subject, a predicate, and an object. The subject is descriptive and printed in larger face than the other words: “We the People”; after setting out the purposes for the action, two verbs follow to indicate the specific form of the action being taken: “ordain and establish” which transitions into the object — “this Constitution of the United States of America.” A parenthetical, set off by commas and context following the subject, sets forth the list of items that constitute the purposes:
Establish Justice,
Insure domestic tranquility,
Provide for the common defense,
Promote the general welfare, and
Secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity
PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF THE PREAMBLE
Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the Federal Government,[1] the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution.[2] “Its true office,” wrote Joseph Story in his Commentaries, “is to expound the nature and extent and application of the powers actually conferred by the Constitution, and not substantively to create them. For example, the preamble declares one object to be, ‘provide for the common defense.’ No one can doubt that this does not enlarge the powers of Congress to pass any measures which they deem useful for the common defence. But suppose the terms of a given power admit of two constructions, the one more restrictive, the other more liberal, and each of them is consistent with the words, but is, and ought to be, governed by the intent of the power; if one could promote and the other defeat the common defence, ought not the former, upon the soundest principles of interpretation, to be adopted?” [3]